![]() Behind a proxy it will confirm a recent sync (e.g., "Synced at ) when it has not actually completed a successful sync.If I completely disconnect the internet it will remain stuck in “Syncing” state, which is expected.Because there is no standard error code to tell clients that the error was due to a web proxy.Ĭlients can fail for various reasons not only web proxy.īut in this case the failure is being falsely reported as “Synced”, instead of “Failed”? This is individual use - for example, my home workstation has Inkdrop installed, as does my laptop which I take to different locations, some proxied. No, since it is designed to be basically used by a person, not a team. The local revision is present, but is sometimes several entries deep from the previous revision, so it looks like I’ve missed it during previous sync issues.Īdditionally, after further sync attempts on and off the proxy from the client, it generated a entry for the note which is great.Īpologies! Also, the patch view is very cool. I mean, if you make a change on client A, the change is only retained in the revision history on client A.Įdit - to confirm, on testing again this is working as you have described. When a normal connection is restored, data is lost from one update. Update the same note across two different clients while one has restricted internet with a silent sync failure.create content while behind a corporate proxy or restricted internet connection, sync does not indicate any failure, but content is not synced.When “Client B” syncs, it destroys the changes on “Client A” instead of creating a conflicted note.Switch “Client B” from proxy to open connection. ![]() ![]() Update note on “Client A” and then “Client B”.Switch “Client B” to a proxy connection (without configuring proxy information in.Edit note on “Client A” and save changes.Using two clients, for example, “Client A” on normal internet, and “Client B” switching between a corporate proxy and open internet: I have noticed that this situation can be used to create data loss though, e.g., by doing the following: Switching from the corporate network to an open network then allows the sync to complete OK. Would it be expected to create a synchronisation error in this case? I have not seen any issues reported under the developer tools. Requesting a manual sync completes OK without error, but not does not turn up on other clients.sync indicator at bottom left indicates a recent sync, however note does not show up on other clients.create a new note and edit it, then save.connect to a network that uses a corporate proxy for web access.launch inkdrop without any proxy configuration in place (e.g, do not configure.When that happens, tell us again about “sustainability”.Observed this in the following conditions: You could listen to your customer base, as most successful products do, and have more of our money, or you can hold out until Boostnote has caught up and people just go with them. It’s up to you, craftzdog, but Boostnote is hot on your trail, it already allows attachments of all formats and its free. So the reason you give (“features that lead to more features”) doesn’t make sense. To make that more clear: when you decided to allow image attachments, you clearly didn’t worry that people would demand an image editor function, and various Photoshop like features. It’s the same thing you can do for images already, just for other formats. In any case, allowing different formats for attachments in no way commits you to developing lots of other features. Why? Because they would have been less useful.įor example, if the app supported PDF format, some people may want a built-in viewer and a full-text search support for pdf files, just like Evernote, even though you don’t need it. How well would those products have done if they had only attached images? Worse. That is why Google Calendar has attachments, that’s why Evernote and Bear also has them and not just for images. Some of those things are in documents that it makes sense directly to attach. So Inkdrop will be more sustainable if you get less money? That’s… …interesting. It would increase the revenues but would lose the sustainability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |